Innovation is something new for many Australian companies
reared on a diet of ‘build to print’ and tiny portions of genuine opportunity.
The word itself engenders suspicion: is it a ‘buzz word’? A fashionable
pre-occupation? It’s certainly not widely understood.
Regardless, Australia’s defence industry needs to understand
and master the process of innovation. In a previous post I looked at innovation
from the point of view of the defence customer; this post addresses innovation
from industry’s point of view.
If the customer is being truly innovative this has
significant implications for his industry and supply base: defence companies will
be exposed to the operational and technological needs of defence forces and the
global prime contractors in a way they’ve never experienced before. To survive,
to flourish, they must become innovators too.
For anybody who thinks the defence industry is special, by
the way, I have news: it’s not. The defence market is special and unique, but the defence industry is like any other high-tech industrial market for capital
goods and services. The good news is that that factors that make a non-defence
company a successful innovator apply also to defence companies, so there’s
plenty of supporting literature and no black magic involved. Of course, every
project is different, some subtly, some quite significantly, but for the
majority it emerges that there are common pre-conditions for innovation
success. They’re quite independent of a specific project – they’re more generic
and they go to the intrinsic attributes and routine behaviours of the
organisations involved.
Boiled down to their essentials, this is what I believe they
are - and none of them are surprising or counter-intuitive:
- Appoint a company leader who’s open to constructive change and keen to innovate
- Organise yourself to innovate: an organic (as opposed to a mechanistic) structure enables and encourages cross-functional communications as well as creating conditions for lateral thinking and idea generation (if necessary, create such a group within your organisation)
- Work towards technical mastery of the domain in which you’re operating: the products, the technology they embody and the technology and expertise required to build them
- Be pro-active in dealing with your customer – both determining his needs and sensitivities, and testing ideas and hypotheses on him (In Australia this means the ADF, DST and the bureaucracy)
- Invest in your R&D and prototyping capabilities
- Conduct R&D systematically, guided by your market knowledge (see 8, 9 and 10 below)
- Be open to external partnerships and sources of technology and IP
- Understand the market in which you’re operating: who the players are (customers as well as rivals, and even suppliers and sub-contractors); why they’re in the market; what’s happening with technology; what else is going to shape the size and behaviour of the market in the future?
- Understand your market position and what (if anything) you need, or intend, to do about it
- Be systematic in your marketing activities (which includes encouraging lateral thinkers and good ideas!)
- Create a cross-functional team to integrate market and technical knowledge and then develop and deliver the project
- Appoint a leader of this team who has REAL authority to drive the project along
Once defence companies understand that their industry sector
isn’t that different, they can then look at their structures, intrinsic
attributes and behaviours, and then start to apply some of the lessons you’ll
find in books by a swag of authors who’ve studied innovation success in depth:
people like Amantha Imber, Roy Rothwell, Jeff Dyer, Nathan Furr, Clayton
Christensen and Steven Johnson (Google them); and there are others.
Defence companies can learn a lot that’ll help them on their
journey, and it’s now a journey with a better-defined destination. The Defence
Industry Capability Plan and Defence Exports Strategy may provide better directions,
but from where I'm standing, close to the start line, you will still only get there by embracing the challenges of the innovation
process.
No comments:
Post a Comment